A Victim's Defense of Priests
By Terry Donovan Urekew
The current crisis in the Catholic Church
regarding the sexual abuse of children by members of the clergy
certainly demands our attention. Sexual abuse, any abuse, of our
children is clearly wrong. But, we must remember, it is equally
wrong whether the perpetrator is the child's daddy, uncle, friend or
church leader. Any abuse of children should provoke the wrath of us
all and should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
As a victim of sexual abuse - first by a family
friend, and later by a Catholic priest - I am appalled and angered
at the recent emphasis on clergy abuse. The media and class-action
lawyers nullify both the spirit and intent of our child abuse laws,
and make a mockery of our judicial system.
If I were to make public allegations against the
priest who abused me, what would happen? He would, of course, be
presumed guilty immediately, with no consideration given to the
validity of my accusation. He would be forbidden to continue in his
ministry. His name and photo would appear in local, regional and
state newspapers, and on local, even national television. The
details of my accusation would be table talk from one end of this
country to the other.
His reputation would be destroyed, and his future
would be forever changed. All this would happen whether or not he
was guilty.
On the other hand, if I were to hunt down and
accuse the family friend who abused me, another story would develop.
There would be, perhaps, a small article on page nine of the local
paper. My lawyer would seek an indictment and arrest. After making
bail, my perpetrator would continue to live his life, work in his
chosen profession. He would stand trial, and, his word against mine,
probably go free. His life would get back to normal, even if he was
guilty.
I certainly believe that anyone who molests
children should pay. But I suggest that the current emphasis on
clergy abuse is disproportionate and inappropriate simply because it
ignores and downplays child sexual abuse by members of all other
groups. Why don't we seek to expose all members of the local
plumbers union who are abusers? Or the firefighters union? Or
factory workers? Or rabbis? Or journalists and newscasters?
The Catholic clergy doesn't own this problem.
Pedophilia knows no cultural, ethnic, socioeconomic or religious
boundaries. We all own the problem.
Another element in the crisis is the potential for
financial compensation. If I were to accuse my priest abuser, the
class action lawyers would make sure I ended up with a substantial
sum of money. The going rate for clergy sexual abuse seems pretty
high.
My non-clergy abuser, however, probably wouldn't
end up paying anything to compensate me for pain, suffering, and the
loss of my innocence. That certainly takes the choice out of my
hands. Go for the dough!
I know at least three persons who have made
allegations against priests whose primary, more severe, abuse was at
the hands of men who were not priests. Those other three men will
never be prosecuted, will never pay for their crimes. You can be
sure the priests will pay. And, ultimately, the Catholic people will
pay. Each payment made to victims places more burden on us, the
working and retired parishioners whose contributions support our
church.
And what of the priests who are accused unjustly?
We have a recent, much publicized example in Cardinal Joseph
Bernardin. His health, future, career and ministry were all damaged
by a man who later recanted the whole story. The cardinal graciously
forgave the man, but the toll it took quite possibly hastened his
death.
There are priests, and bishops, being falsely
accused during this recent hype - and members of the media must bear
some responsibility for that. They will jump on any story, no matter
how farfetched, how absurd, simply because it makes great copy. But
these false accusations are yet another kind of abuse, and they
cause inordinate trauma to the victims. People in the media will
somehow be called to bear their pain.
My own sexual abuse happened more than 30 years
ago, in Boston, Mass. I have had many years in which to recover and
heal. Even if there were no statute of limitations for this crime, I
would choose not to accuse my perpetrators. As brutal as the abuse
was, as significant the loss of innocence, as devastating the
betrayal of trust, I have come through it to the other side. I am
much stronger for having dealt with the pain.
My perpetrators are dealing with worse than
I have been through. They must live with themselves. It satisfies
something deep within me to leave them in the hands of God.
This originally appeared in the Oct. 11, 2002 issue of
Commonweal Magazine, © 2002 Commonweal Foundation
|